OneFinity 價格ONE

A White House official confirmed that the Trump administration is pursuing an aggressive Bitcoin acquisition plan to build a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve while keeping expenditures budget neutral. The announcement came during a meeting with prominent crypto industry leaders. During a closed-door roundtable hosted by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, Bo Hines, executive director of the Presidential Working Group on Digital Assets, outlined plans to accumulate as much Bitcoin as possible. He compared questions about acquisition size to asking how many dollars one would want. Attendees reported that the approach aims to strengthen the nation’s digital reserve without affecting taxpayers. A tweet from Bitcoin Magazine noted that a White House official explained the administration’s intent to maximize Bitcoin purchases. This message reinforces the commitment to expand government-held Bitcoin through strategic acquisitions. The official clarification emphasized that all purchases would occur in a budget-neutral manner. The focus remains on reinforcing a secure and stable reserve while maintaining fiscal discipline. The private roundtable took place following a public “Bitcoin for America” policy summit and included top Bitcoin industry figures. Participants included Michael Saylor, CEO of Strategy; Fred Thiel, CEO of MARA Holdings; Nathan McCauley, CEO of Anchorage Digital; and David Bailey, CEO of Bitcoin Magazine. U.S. senators Cynthia Lummis, Bill Hagerty, and Bernie Moreno also attended the meeting. During the discussion, an attendee asked Hines whether the White House supported proposed legislation known as the Bitcoin Act. This bill suggests that the government purchase up to one million BTC, valued at around $80 billion. Hines turned to Senator Lummis to indicate that the administration would support legislation to formalize a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Officials clarified that no specific bill was endorsed during the session, yet pressure will be applied to ensure favorable legislative outcomes. The U.S. Treasury Department recently met with executives from three crypto custody firms to discuss safeguarding the proposed reserve. Anchorage Digital, a key custodian, participated in these meetings with Treasury officials. The discussions are part of a broader effort to ensure the secure management of the nation’s digital assets. Current estimates indicate that the government holds nearly 200,000 BTC , mainly acquired through civil and criminal forfeitures. Senior White House officials have stressed that any further Bitcoin purchases must remain budget-neutral. The plan aims to expand the reserve while protecting taxpayer interests and strengthening national financial security. Meetings and discussions like these reflect a coordinated effort to integrate Bitcoin into government operations. The approach demonstrates a careful balance between aggressive asset accumulation and strict fiscal responsibility. DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Ethereum is bleeding value as Layer 2 (L2) solutions extract fees, maximal extractable value (MEV), and liquidity without adequately contributing to its security. If this continues, Ethereum may become nothing more than a passive security layer while L2s generate massive profits. This situation raises concerns about Ethereum’s long-term sustainability and economic alignment with rollups. Currently, L2s pay minimal fees to Ethereum while making substantial revenue. For example, Base generated approximately $2.5 million in fees last month but only paid Ethereum $11,000. Optimism earned $321 for every $1 it contributed to Ethereum. Consequently, L2s enjoy high profitability , while Ethereum sees little benefit from the value they generate. Additionally, most rollups do not use ETH as gas. Instead, they create their own tokens, further reducing Ethereum’s direct value capture. Although L2s rely on Ethereum’s security, they contribute only a fraction of what they extract. This economic imbalance is unsustainable and demands a solution. To address this issue, L2s must contribute to Ethereum’s economic security. One solution involves requiring L2 sequencers to stake ETH as collateral. This approach ensures that rollups remain financially tied to Ethereum’s success. Furthermore, a portion of all L2 fees should be redirected to Ethereum stakers. MEV generated on rollups must also be redistributed to Ethereum validators. Besides, if an L2 does not use ETH as gas, it should be required to either stake ETH or allocate a portion of its token supply to an ETH vault. This vault would act as an index of rollup economies, reinforcing Ethereum’s role as the financial foundation . Ethereum validators should secure rollups, not just the base layer. L2 sequencers must stake ETH, ensuring Ethereum remains integral to rollup operations. Moreover, ETH should be the primary settlement asset for cross-rollup transactions. Native gas tokens can coexist, but Ethereum’s liquidity layer must remain dominant. DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

JasmyCoin (JASMY) has busted out of a symmetrical triangle setup, which is bullish, according to analyst Crypto front. Price is at $0.01417, trying to go up. The price, however, may be held back from going up higher by steep resistance between $0.01500 and $0.01600. This coming week might be the one that informs us whether JASMY continues to go up or gets rejected . JASMY bulls have managed to push the price above the symmetrical triangle, confirming a breakout. The breakout candle shows increased buying pressure, suggesting a potential upward continuation. However, the price remains below a major supply zone. This region, between $0.01500 and $0.01600, previously served as strong support before a sharp breakdown occurred. If JASMY reclaims this area, it could confirm a shift in market structure. The measured move from the breakout suggests a 27.03% price increase, setting a target of approximately $0.01700. However, this depends on whether the macroeconomic environment supports bullish sentiment. Stock markets and gold prices may influence JASMY’s momentum. Moreover, liquidity remains high, with a tight bid-ask spread. The buy price stands at $0.01418, while the sell price is $0.01417. This indicates strong market participation and interest in JASMY at current levels. The 1-hour chart reflects a previous downtrend, followed by consolidation and a bullish breakout. Higher lows formed before the breakout, further strengthening the bullish case. If JASMY breaks above the supply zone , bullish momentum could extend toward the next resistance at $0.01700. Conversely, if sellers re-enter the market, the price may retest lower support levels. Besides, traders should watch for price reactions within the key resistance zone. A clean breakout and retest above this level could confirm a stronger uptrend. Otherwise, rejection at resistance might lead to a pullback. DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

A wind of dissent is blowing over Washington. A legislator is directly challenging Donald Trump’s initiative to create a strategic reserve of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. For him, this project is far from a visionary advance: it is more of a dubious maneuver, built on unstable ground where private interests and public funds intertwine. Donald Trump’s project, announced with much fanfare and bold declarations, plans the constitution of a national reserve of bitcoin. The official goal? To strengthen the United States’ position in the digital asset market and guarantee a strategic stock of cryptos. But for the legislator at the origin of this challenge, it is primarily a smokescreen designed to serve the financial interests of Trump and his close associates. Behind this project, a harsher reality is emerging. According to critics, this reserve would benefit neither the economic stability of the country nor the American citizens. It would rather provide a financial windfall to investors already well-positioned in the bitcoin market, including influential Republican donors. A decision that resembles more a political favor than a rigorous economic strategy. Beyond suspicions of personal interests, the creation of a bitcoin reserve by the state poses a real problem of monetary governance. If the United States decides to allocate public funds for crypto purchases, they are directly intervening in a notoriously volatile and unpredictable market. A member of the Federal Reserve has already described this idea as “the greatest monetary absurdity ever contemplated“. An opinion shared by many economists, who fear that this initiative exposes public finances to reckless risks. Because unlike gold, the historical reserve of nations, bitcoin offers no guarantee of stability and its price can collapse on a simple tweet from Elon Musk or a sudden Chinese regulation. The legislator behind this dissent therefore calls on the Treasury to backtrack before it is too late. He points out the lack of consultation from Congress and the total absence of transparency surrounding this project, and demands that the Treasury abandon this initiative without delay. The battle is just beginning. Opposition to this bitcoin reserve is intensifying, and with it, a crucial debate on the future of cryptocurrencies within state policies. Financial revolution or opportunistic drift? One thing is certain: this matter is far from over. Meanwhile, in Russia, the Central Bank wants to structure the crypto market.

Is the competition in the crypto industry pushing Ledger to attack Trezor, or is it a timely warning for all users? Behind this revelation lies a major issue: the security of wallets. Ledger has demonstrated that Trezor’s Safe 3 and Safe 5 models had a critical flaw. A simple workaround of the firmware potentially allowed access to users’ funds. How was this breach discovered and corrected? Ledger Donjon, the cybersecurity research branch of Ledger, discovered a critical vulnerability in Trezor’s wallets Safe 3 and Safe 5. While studying the security of these models, researchers found that cryptographic operations were performed on a microcontroller vulnerable to advanced attacks. The problem? A hacker could theoretically modify the firmware and bypass the integrity check, making unauthorized access to users’ digital assets possible. “We believe that strengthening the crypto ecosystem benefits everyone “, stated Charles Guillemet, CTO of Ledger. A discovery raising questions about the robustness of competing wallets. Trezor responded promptly by applying a patch, demonstrating its commitment to security. But this incident highlights a troubling reality: security flaws are not just anomalies, but ongoing threats. If a breach has been patched today, how many more remain to be discovered in the world of crypto wallets? Hardware wallets are supposed to be the ultimate vault for digital assets, but this incident shows that none are infallible. Trezor introduced Secure Elements, chips designed to protect private keys against physical attacks. However, Ledger revealed that this protection could be bypassed via the microcontroller, rendering the flaw exploitable. Facing the threat, Trezor recalled that its firmware has an integrity check to prevent any malicious modifications. But Ledger demonstrated that this protection could be bypassed by a determined attacker. A simple physical access could compromise a crypto wallet, a worrying situation for altcoin and bitcoin investors. Some notable figures: If traders and holders of digital assets thought that their wallet was impregnable, this incident reminds them that caution is necessary. In the world of digital assets, cybersecurity is a never-ending battle. Trezor and Ledger strive to improve the protection of their wallets, but hackers continue to refine their techniques. Every innovation brings its share of vulnerabilities, turning security into a game of cat and mouse. The latest flaw highlights an underestimated risk: physical attacks via the supply chain. In theory, a malicious actor could compromise a crypto wallet even before it’s purchased by a user, thus opening a sneaky breach in the protection of digital assets. Ledger emphasizes the importance of Secure Elements and firmware integrity checks to prevent unauthorized access. Yet, even with these measures, threats are constantly evolving. As Trezor stated: In cybersecurity, the golden rule is simple: nothing is infallible. A statement that resonates as attack methods become increasingly sophisticated. Some concerning elements: How far will manufacturers have to go to secure crypto wallets? Should we expect new flaws or innovations capable of eradicating these risks? One thing is certain, the crypto industry must redouble its vigilance, as attackers, themselves, never sleep. This flaw reminds us that the security of wallets does not solely rely on technology, but also on the vigilance of users. Ledger itself has been a victim of phishing campaigns and data leaks in the past. Nothing is ever completely secure in the crypto universe, and staying alert remains the best protection.