Octavia AI 價格VIA

Last week, OKX refuted allegations of scrutiny by European regulators regarding potential fund transfers via its DEX aggregation service. The company acknowledged taking preemptive measures to intercept assets linked to the $1.4 billion Bybit security compromise that transpired in late February. On Sunday, OKX released a blog post announcing the temporary suspension of its DEX aggregator functionalities. “This move allows us to implement additional upgrades to prevent further misuse,” OKX said. “We know that transparency is key, so we’re also working closely with blockchain explorers to correct incomplete labeling. Our goal is to ensure that explorers properly highlight the actual DEX processing trades rather than mistakenly identifying our aggregator as the point of trade.” OKX disclosed that its team deployed a “detection system” for OKX Web3, a feature introduced just days prior. Furthermore, the firm operates a real-time tracking infrastructure to monitor illicit wallet addresses, empowering its centralized exchange (CEX) to obstruct unauthorized transactions. OKX further emphasized to users that OKX Web3 operates as an inherently non-custodial platform. The crypto firm stated: One thing we want to make absolutely clear: OKX Web3 is a DEX aggregator, not a custodian of customer assets. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

OKX suspends DEX aggregator service due to detection of North Korean Lazarus attack Crypto exchange OKX announced via X that it is temporarily suspending its decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator service and making significant updates to its security system. This comes after…

The institutions are coming to Token Terminal 👇 @RobinhoodApp via USDG @krakenfx via Ink @coinbase via Base @PayPal via PYUSD @BlackRock via BUIDL @FTDA_US via FOBXX

The Aave DAO has spoken: there will be no new token. The decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) reached a consensus that there is no significant interest in launching a new asset, despite discussions on how a new token could potentially accelerate revenue growth through liquidity bootstrapping. Stani Kulechov, founder of Aave, shared the update in a post on X, making it clear: the team respects the DAO’s decision and will not push forward any initiative that lacks strong community backing. “Overall consensus across the Aave DAO is that there is no interest in other tokens,” Kulechov wrote . The concerns were clear. Analyst Mika Honkasalo raised the issue that AAVE holders might expect future earnings from any new product associated with Aave. He likened the situation to a company issuing new equity for a separate product – a move that can confuse investors about the true value. Kulechov clarified that the proposed Horizon token is not an Aave initiative. Instead, it is a separate project by Avara, which aims to acquire a tech license to use Aave’s infrastructure for part of its business. He acknowledged that there was a gap in expectations but reassured the community that Aave’s focus remains on growing its ecosystem while respecting DAO governance. Related: Aave (AAVE) Price Prediction 2024-2030: Will AAVE Price Hit $500 Soon? While the rejection of a new token is final, Aave remains committed to exploring Real-World Assets (RWAs) as a revenue stream. Kulechov stressed that RWAs are an important area of growth for Aave DAO. As a result, the team will refine its approach based on community feedback. The goal is to find the right way to integrate RWAs into the Aave ecosystem without compromising decentralization or governance principles. Kulechov’s statement highlights that AAVE remains the primary governance and utility token of the ecosystem. “There is only AAVE,” he stated, stressing that the protocol will continue to focus on strengthening its existing token rather than diversifying into new assets. Related: Aave Chain Initiative Founder Faults MakerDAO’s Proposed $1B Allocation Via Morpho Labs This decision reinforces Aave’s commitment to decentralized governance and ensures that any future developments align with the community’s long-term vision. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

To avoid potential conflicts of interest, Crypto Czar David Sacks, an advisor to President Donald Trump, has liquidated more than $200 million in digital-asset holdings. The move follows mounting criticism over his financial ties to the crypto sector and his advocacy for a bitcoin strategic reserve. Sacks has faced scrutiny on social media and from U.S. lawmakers, including the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, due to his involvement in the digital-asset space. A memo released by the White House now reveals that Sacks and his venture firm, Craft Ventures, moved to minimize any potential conflicts. The timing is notable: the memorandum was released a day before Senator Elizabeth Warren’s March 6 letter, demanding that he confirm he no longer owns any digital assets, following his claim on X that he sold all his crypto. Related: World Liberty Financial: $550M Raised, SEI Purchase, and an Unusual Token Swap Offer Warren wrote, “Despite your public statements via X, it remains unclear exactly when you personally divested from BTC, ETH, and SOL, when Craft Ventures divested from Bitwise, and whether people close to you ‘may have held positions and sold into the recent price surge.” Key divestments made by Sacks and Craft Ventures include: Related: U.S. Senate Committee OKs Stablecoin Bill, Balancing State & Federal Roles Altogether, Sacks and Craft Ventures have divested over $200 million in digital-asset holdings, with at least $85 million directly attributed to Sacks himself. The divestments came at a significant tax cost, as special government employees, like Sacks, are not entitled to certificates of divestiture . Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.