Turboの‌価格TURBO

this is a good point i've seen it argued quite a few times that we value unilateral exit a bit too much wrt finality, the argument orkun is making is that statechains don't have provable key deletion. so users are never really sure if they can trust that they won't be rugged (e.g. the operator spends their funds with some previous owner) down the line rollups differ in the fact that the sequencer(s) have to build upon the latest checkpoint posted to bitcoin. full nodes will reject new state if they don't so after a commitment is posted and accepted into bitcoin, rollup users have a "finality assurance" that their tx won't be reverted and they can't be rugged wrt custody, statechains are effectively 2-2 multisigs between users and operators. if the operators delete the key from the previous owner, then the current owner has immediate ability to spend funds. if the operator goes offline, they can unilaterally exit rollups see users give up custody to middlemen known as operators. whilst they don't have custody of funds, they can keep operators honest through some fraud proof magic. basically if any operator is honest, they can withdraw funds (eventually). if not, funds are frozen but not "lost" there's way more too this but i'm sad today and don't want to write it all out. the tl;dr is that statechains and rollups are literally complete opposites on the tradeoff spectrum and orkun brought up this example because i'm turbo bullish statechains rn but it's worth pointing out the tradeoff spectrum different use cases for different users. may all l2s bloom and compete in the free market inshallah

🧠 Current Altcoin Pump Analysis (Mid 2025) 🔻 Bitcoin Dominance Dropping Bitcoin dominance has been trending downward from highs above 55% earlier in the year to below 48% recently. This signals capital rotation from BTC into riskier assets, which is a classic alt season trigger. 📊 Money Flow Rotation Institutional and whale capital is cycling from: 1. BTC → ETH (liquidity staging) 2. ETH → Large-cap Alts (SOL, AVAX, LINK) 3. Large-cap Alts → Mid- and Low-caps (meme coins, AI, gaming, DePIN) This waterfall effect causes serial pumps. Projects with weak fundamentals still explode because the trade is narrative-driven, not utility-driven. 🔥 On-Chain Data Confirms Speculation Gas fees on Ethereum and Solana have spiked, confirming high on-chain activity. DEX volumes (Uniswap, Jupiter, PancakeSwap) are up 300–500% month-over-month. Wallet creation and token swaps suggest significant retail entry, a strong alt season signature. 📉 Low Liquidity Drives Volatility Many of the recent pumps are in tokens with < $100M market caps. These coins move violently with little capital inflow. Examples: AI tokens surged 200–400% on only $20–30M volume. Memecoins like $WIF, $BENJI, and $TURBO posted 10x moves off pure sentiment. 🪙 Narrative-Driven Microcycles 2025 alt season isn't uniform—it’s narrative-fragmented: AI tokens pumped due to Nvidia earnings and AI hype. Memecoins exploded after Elon Musk tweets and TikTok hype. Layer 2 / Gasless chains gained due to ETH congestion. This narrative stacking drives mini-pumps that chain-react across sectors. ⚠️ Sustainability Warning Many altcoin pumps are not backed by user growth or protocol revenues. This alt season is driven by speculation, leverage, and trend momentum. A reversal in BTC or ETH will rapidly unwind gains in these alts. --- ✅ Conclusion The current alt season is a speculation-driven liquidity rotation phase, largely fueled by: Declining BTC dominance Narrative hype cycles High retail participation Low-cap liquidity-driven pumps It's not fundamentally sustainable, but can continue as long as BTC and ETH remain stable and risk appetite is high.

Probs would’ve been ambitious to expect a turbo boomer asset like ETH to straight break out thru resistance Hope it does this week tho It may not be a great asset per se but deserves higher surely Remain long onit mostly anyway

We are about to turbo-blast. Which horse shall I back between Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tao?? I am torn. 🤔 And it could be that there is no wrong answer.

The reality is that "Onboarding someone into Crypto" Actually just means getting them to passively buy bitcoin It's unlikely that the average person wants to participate in crypto the way CT does Turbo-gambling on hyper-niche crypto coins will never be a mainstream thing