Space Token PreisSPACE

The dumbest thing our space did was convincing founders that giving up double 10%+ of the network, for free, was a good idea.

there is a project brewing in the Ethereum L1 infra space. only a select group of people know about it today. Validators are tired of waiting for L1 hard forks. They are taking things into their own hands. Ethereum is about to get so much faster.

听space之前 提前学习一下 $loud 到底是干嘛的！ 插眼

ok 今晚大的要來了 @stayloudio 有機會讓 @0x_ultra 面對面華語 Kaito 玩家了！ 👀 感謝 @bobabillionaire 組織這場 space , 一起參與的還有 @crypto_Abao @yueya_eth Loudio 為何限制 top 25 才能分到獎勵？其他人有何參與方式, 如果有預售的話, 一般玩家有參與的空間嗎？ 🧐 相信有非常多中文區的人都有各種問題想問, 畢竟現在看 Loudio 榜單上清一色都是英文圈用戶啊 😅 針對昨天 @stayloudio 發出文章後的各種疑惑, 我也簡單整理了幾個大哥有在留言區公開提問 Ultra 的內容 Ethos founder @serpinxbt 有提到一點有趣的 Loudio 不存在「兩邊一起退出更慘」的情況：雙方同時離場對各自都是風險降到 0，而不是像先前以 $OHM Olympus 為首系統中的價格崩潰 嚴格意義上 它更像「單向補貼的飛輪」 而非囚徒困境（3,3） ☑️ 正循環：交易者的 ROI > 手續費 + 風險溢酬：才能持續交易。 💀 負循環：量縮 → 平台收益下降 → 補貼減少 → Yapper 動力下降 → 流量進一步下滑 所以很明顯，如何持續刺激交易量以及價格支撐是 Loudio 能否持續很重要的一環 ---- @Deebs_DeFi 也提到：很多人當前已經把 $LOUD 貼上「只讓大 V 吃肉的付費 shill」標籤，如果不是一個 community token 其實大家的參與意願肯定會降低 一般社群會不會也有公開、可參與的預售（presale）名額呢 👀 這一點其實 Ultra 有在過去的 space 當中提到過 ---- 有興趣的記得設定一下提醒, 晚點見 🫡

The world of cryptocurrency is constantly evolving, and the people shaping its future through regulation are under increasing scrutiny. Recent news surrounding Brian Quintenz, nominated by former President Donald Trump to potentially lead the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), highlights the intersection of traditional finance, political appointments, and the burgeoning digital asset space. His recent Financial disclosure has revealed significant personal assets and deep connections within the crypto industry, raising important questions about potential conflicts of interest and the future direction of Crypto regulation under his potential leadership. Brian Quintenz is no stranger to the regulatory landscape. He previously served as a CFTC commissioner from 2017 to 2021. During his tenure, he was often seen as a voice advocating for clarity and sensible approaches to regulating digital assets. His return to the CFTC, this time potentially as its head, would place him in a powerful position to influence how cryptocurrencies, derivatives, and related markets are overseen in the United States. The CFTC plays a crucial role in the crypto ecosystem. It has asserted jurisdiction over certain digital assets deemed commodities, such as Bitcoin and Ether. The agency is responsible for preventing manipulation and fraud in commodity markets, which increasingly includes crypto derivatives like futures and swaps. Therefore, the stance and background of the CFTC chairperson have significant implications for market participants, innovators, and investors alike. According to reports from Cointelegraph, citing Bloomberg, Brian Quintenz‘s financial disclosure filing indicates holdings valued at a minimum of $3.4 million. While this figure represents a snapshot of his assets, the breakdown of these holdings provides key insights into his financial interests, particularly his ties to the technology and crypto investment sectors. Key points from the disclosure include: This level of detail in a financial disclosure is standard for high-level government nominees, intended to provide transparency and identify potential conflicts of interest that might arise if confirmed for the position. Perhaps the most notable aspect of Brian Quintenz‘s disclosure, from a crypto perspective, is his current role and investments related to Andreessen Horowitz. Since leaving his CFTC commissioner post in 2021, Quintenz has served as the global head of crypto policy at a16z. This position involves engaging with policymakers and regulators worldwide to advocate for policies favorable to the growth and development of the crypto and web3 industries. His investments in a16z’s investment vehicles further solidify this connection. The disclosure specifically mentions stakes in three funds: Andreessen Horowitz has been one of the most active and influential investors in the crypto space, backing numerous startups across various sectors, including decentralized finance (DeFi), NFTs, infrastructure, and exchanges. Quintenz’s role and investments place him squarely within the core of the crypto investment ecosystem, providing him with unique insights but also potentially creating perceived conflicts of interest should he be tasked with regulating firms or technologies in which a16z (and by extension, he) has a financial stake. Beyond his role at a16z, Brian Quintenz‘s disclosure also reveals his involvement with Kalshi. He serves on the board of directors for the prediction market platform and holds both equity and unvested stock options in the company. Kalshi allows users to trade on the outcome of future events, ranging from economic indicators to weather patterns. Prediction markets have sometimes touched upon areas that could fall under regulatory purview, depending on how they are structured and the underlying events being traded. His direct financial interest and board membership at Kalshi add another layer to his complex relationship with potentially regulated entities within the broader digital and event-based trading markets. The nomination of someone with such extensive and recent ties to the crypto industry, coupled with significant financial holdings in related ventures, sparks considerable debate regarding Crypto regulation. On one hand, proponents might argue that Quintenz’s deep understanding of the technology and market dynamics, gained through his work at a16z and involvement with companies like Kalshi, makes him uniquely qualified to craft effective and informed regulations. They might see his background as a benefit, ensuring that rules are practical and don’t stifle innovation. On the other hand, critics may express concerns about potential conflicts of interest. They might worry that his past and present financial interests could influence his regulatory decisions, potentially favoring the companies or sectors in which he or his former employer have invested. Navigating these potential conflicts, should he be confirmed, will be a critical challenge for Brian Quintenz. The confirmation process will likely involve scrutiny of these ties and assets by the relevant Senate committee. Quintenz would need to demonstrate how he intends to manage any potential conflicts, which could involve recusal from certain matters or other ethics arrangements. Brian Quintenz’s nomination represents a pivotal moment for the future of Crypto regulation in the U.S. His background offers a blend of regulatory experience and deep industry knowledge. However, his substantial Financial disclosure and extensive ties to major players like Andreessen Horowitz and Kalshi mean his confirmation process will be closely watched. Market participants, policymakers, and the public will be keen to understand how Quintenz plans to balance his past industry affiliations with the public interest responsibilities of leading a key financial regulator like the CFTC. The outcome of his nomination will undoubtedly have a lasting impact on how digital assets are regulated in the years to come. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin institutional adoption. Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.