DeFi Project Bancor Clears Legal Battle as US Court Dismisses Lawsuit
Judge Robert Pitman ruled that Bancor's foreign operations are not subject to US securities laws.
A Texas federal judge on Monday dismissed a securities class action lawsuit against Bancor protocol operators. The judge agreed with a magistrate judge’s findings, stating that the plaintiffs failed to prove US courts had jurisdiction over the foreign defendants.
Judge Robert Pitman ruled that Bancor’s foreign operations are not covered under US securities laws, in line with the magistrate’s recommendation. He based the decision on the plaintiffs’ failure to show that the crypto transactions took place in the US or fell under US jurisdiction.
This means the plaintiffs cannot sue Bancor in the US over its alleged suspension of an investment protection feature.
Bancor, Founders Not Subject to US Jurisdiction, Judge Says
The magistrate judge stated that Bancor, its founders, and related entities in Israel or Switzerland lack sufficient ties to the US. The court, therefore, has no jurisdiction over them.
Further, he noted that US securities laws don’t apply due to extraterritoriality issues. He suggested that plaintiffs could pursue their complaints in Israeli courts, as defendants are based there.
Bancor Hit with Lawsuit After Halting Promised Loss Protection for Investors
In their complaint, the plaintiffs claimed Bancor promoted a feature called impermanent loss protection to shield their investments from losses. This feature supposedly aimed to attract liquidity providers to the protocol, leading to over $2.3b in crypto investments.
They asked the court to cancel their contracts. Also, they argued that Bancor’s failure to follow regulations made the contracts invalid. They also accused Bancor of violating Texas laws. The claims included fraud, breaking promises, mismanaging funds, and unfairly profiting at the investors’ expense.
The lawsuit alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934, along with claims of contract breach and unjust enrichment.
In 2022, after withdrawals triggered payment obligations to liquidity providers, Bancor stopped the impermanent loss protection . As a result, providers faced “the very losses that Defendants had promised to ‘100% protect’ against,” the lawsuit claimed.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Why TradFi firms could turn to bitcoin margin loans: Maple CEO
Maple’s Sid Powell said that TradFi firms have been in contact with the firm about lending and borrowing in crypto
The Daily: ECB President Lagarde rejects bitcoin for Eurozone reserves while the Czech central bank considers it and more
European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said bitcoin is not an option as a reserve asset for the Eurozone’s central bank reserves, citing liquidity, security and regulatory concerns.Meanwhile, the Czech National Bank approved a proposal from Governor Aleš Michl to assess diversifying some of its country’s reserves into bitcoin.
'Inevitable collapse': Trump’s crypto push sparks concern at Paul Singer's Elliott Management: FT
The hedge fund said in a new investor letter that the “inevitable collapse” of the crypto bubble “could wreak havoc,” according to the Financial Times.Elliott’s Paul Singer has never been a fan of crypto, telling WSJ in 2023 that cryptocurrencies are “completely lacking in any value.”
Kiyosaki Dumps Gold and Silver, Projects Bitcoin at $250K by 2025