Spot Bitcoin ETF incoming? Outcomes investors may see from the SEC this week
Many expect the United States Securities and Exchange Commission to approve listing shares of a spot Bitcoin ( BTC ) exchange-traded fund (ETF) on exchanges for the first time by Jan. 10. Even if the regulator should move forward with a decision to approve, there are many possibilities to what approval may look like.
Deny, deny, deny
Despite all the positive signs pointing to approval, at the time of publication, there is no absolute guarantee that the SEC will still decide to give the green light to a spot Bitcoin ETF. Several asset managers completed some of the last stages of paperwork in filing Form 19b-4 amendments on Jan. 5 and amended Form S-1 filings on Jan. 8.
Historically, the SEC has never approved a spot cryptocurrency exchange-traded product for U.S. exchanges, and only in 2021 started to allow ETFs with exposure to crypto futures. An October court ruling forced the commission to revisit a spot Bitcoin ETF application from Grayscale Investments, but this would presumably still allow the SEC to deny an investment vehicle for different reasons.
Multiple simultaneous approvals
Many analysts have speculated that should the SEC move forward with at least one spot Bitcoin ETF application, more would likely follow. In this scenario, asset managers including Valkyrie, WisdomTree, BlackRock, VanEck, Invesco and Galaxy, Grayscale, Fidelity, Bitwise and Franklin Templeton could see approval on Jan. 10 as the SEC addresses the deadline for an ETF proposed by ARK Invest and 21Shares.
The firms with applications pending seem to be aware of this potential outcome. BlackRock reportedly plans to acquire $10 million worth of BTC as initial funding for its ETF, and companies seem to have gotten competitive in listing sponsor fees for their respective ETF offerings — e.g., 0.25% from ARK Invest and 0.24% from Bitwise.
Related: ‘Nothing left to decide’ — Former SEC chair says Bitcoin ETF is inevitable
“If the BTC ETF gets approved, there might be significant increases in the infrastructure, meme coins, and application projects related to the BTC ecosystem,” said Juan Aranovich of Ryze Labs. “However, if the BTC ETF is not approved, the tokens of related ecosystem projects might experience even more severe declines.”
Some approved, some denied or deferred
Should the SEC approve some applications from asset managers but reject others, the reasoning provided would have to stand up to scrutiny. Given the similarities between applications, it’s unlikely that the commission could deny one based on concerns over investor protection and potential market manipulation — as it has previously stated — and approve another.
The commission faces a Jan. 10 final deadline for the ETF proposed by ARK Invest and 21Shares, but decisions on many others could be deferred until March and beyond, depending on the filing dates. Some experts have suggested this is an unlikely outcome but cannot offer 100% certainty that the SEC won’t do an about-face based on the filings over the last seven days.
Magazine: 10 best long reads about crypto in 2023
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
XRP Price Set for Breakout Amid Parallels to 2017’s Epic Rally
MAJORUSDT now launched for futures trading and trading bots
Bitget has launched MAJORUSDT for futures trading with a maximum leverage of 20, along with support for futures trading bots, on November 28, 2024 (UTC+8). Welcome to try futures trading via our official website (www.bitget.com) or Bitget APP. MAJORUSDT-M perpetual futures: Parameters Details Listi
Top Altcoins with Rising Sentiment Post-Market Recovery
Pump Science apologizes after GitHub key leak leads to fraudulent tokens
Share link:In this post: The DeSci platform Pump Science has warned its users not to trust any tokens launched using its Pump.fun profile. Pump Science said it would never launch its tokens on Pump.fun. While Pump Science holds BuilderZ partially responsible for the security breach, it does not think BuilderZ was the attacker.