Precio de Blue ProtocolBLUE

I‘ve often heard that $BTC will rise because M2 rises along this chart. IMO this is complete nonsense and I‘ll explain you why. First of all most of these BTC/M2 comparisons are fundamentally flawed. Reasons: 1. Global M2 Money Supply is not denominated in Bitcoin or USD price terms. M2 measures all money supply (cash, checking, savings accounts, money market securities, etc.) globally — it’s trillions of dollars, not correlated 1:1 with Bitcoin’s USD price. Mapping it like this is fundamentally wrong. 2. The scaling is completely artificial. Often the M2 Money Supply (yellow line) is scaled on the Y axis onto the Bitcoin chart — but without proper normalization. They basically “forced” it to look similar by stretching it over the Bitcoin price range — no setious Analyst does this 3. The 90 Days Offset is arbitrary and misleading. Shifting one dataset by 90 days forward doesn’t prove causality. It’s just data fitting after the fact to create fake-looking “correlations.” 4. Exponential M2 Growth is real — but Bitcoin doesn’t mechanically follow it. Yes, more money printing (higher M2) theoretically leads to asset inflation, but Bitcoin’s price is influenced by many more factors: adoption, speculation, regulation, mining economics, liquidity cycles, etc. Bitcoin =/= direct function of M2. It’s a severe oversimplification. 5. M2 goes vertical — Bitcoin does not so far. If Bitcoin would mirror this M2 Graph directly, you’d already see Bitcoin at higher prices. Most of these charts try to force a narrative (“Bitcoin will explode because M2 exploded”) without any real statistical or economic backing. It’s pure hopium propaganda, not analysis. So let’s dive into the TRUTH of the correlation between $BTC and M2 and let’s add SPX as reference. Have a look at chart attached: Global M2 (Blue): Steady, slow growth year by year. Think of it as a slow-moving ocean current S&P 500 (Green): Gradual, more predictable growth, with relatively mild fluctuations compared to Bitcoin. Bitcoin (Orange): Very volatile movements — huge booms and busts — but when smoothed, you can see that Bitcoin’s general trend sometimes moves in the same direction as the S&P 500. => Bitcoin behaves more like a “high-beta tech stock” rather than a pure inflation hedge tied to M2. So this is the true relationship between BTC and M2 and SPX: Bitcoin vs S&P 500: There is some directional correlation — when stocks rise, Bitcoin often rises too (but with much bigger swings). Bitcoin vs M2: There is a weak long-term background support from M2 growth, but short-term movements are not tightly linked at all. Bitcoin is a liquidity amplifier — But it is NOT a simple liquidity mirror. It thrives when liquidity is abundant, but it explodes or crashes based on market psychology, not just M2 expansion. In other words: Bitcoin is fueled by liquidity, but it’s moved by excitement, speculation, and risk appetite far more than M2 itself.

I‘ve often heard that $BTC will go parabolic because M2 does too. IMO this is complete nonsense and I‘ll explain you why. First of all most of these BTC/M2 comparison charts are fundamentally flawed (example attached). Reasons: 1. Global M2 Money Supply is not denominated in Bitcoin or USD price terms. M2 measures all money supply (cash, checking, savings accounts, money market securities, etc.) globally — it’s trillions of dollars, not correlated 1:1 with Bitcoin’s USD price. Mapping it like this is fundamentally wrong. 2. The scaling is completely artificial. Often the M2 Money Supply (yellow line) is scaled on the Y axis onto the Bitcoin chart — but without proper normalization. They basically “forced” it to look similar by stretching it over the Bitcoin price range — no setious Analyst does this 3. The 90 Days Offset is arbitrary and misleading. Shifting one dataset by 90 days forward doesn’t prove causality. It’s just data fitting after the fact to create fake-looking “correlations.” 4. Exponential M2 Growth is real — but Bitcoin doesn’t mechanically follow it. Yes, more money printing (higher M2) theoretically leads to asset inflation, but Bitcoin’s price is influenced by many more factors: adoption, speculation, regulation, mining economics, liquidity cycles, etc. Bitcoin =/= direct function of M2. It’s a severe oversimplification. 5. M2 goes vertical — Bitcoin does not so far. If Bitcoin would mirror this M2 Graph directly, you’d already see Bitcoin at higher prices. Most of these charts try to force a narrative (“Bitcoin will explode because M2 exploded”) without any real statistical or economic backing. It’s pure hopium propaganda, not analysis. So let’s dive into the TRUTH of the correlation between $BTC and M2 and let’s add SPX as reference. Have a look at chart attached: Global M2 (Blue): Steady, slow growth year by year. Think of it as a slow-moving ocean current S&P 500 (Green): Gradual, more predictable growth, with relatively mild fluctuations compared to Bitcoin. Bitcoin (Orange): Very volatile movements — huge booms and busts — but when smoothed, you can see that Bitcoin’s general trend sometimes moves in the same direction as the S&P 500. => Bitcoin behaves more like a “high-beta tech stock” rather than a pure inflation hedge tied to M2. So this is the true relationship between BTC and M2 and SPX: Bitcoin vs S&P 500: There is some directional correlation — when stocks rise, Bitcoin often rises too (but with much bigger swings). Bitcoin vs M2: There is a weak long-term background support from M2 growth, but short-term movements are not tightly linked at all. Bitcoin is a liquidity amplifier — But it is NOT a simple liquidity mirror. It thrives when liquidity is abundant, but it explodes or crashes based on market psychology, not just M2 expansion. In other words: Bitcoin is fueled by liquidity, but it’s moved by excitement, speculation, and risk appetite far more than M2 itself.

Bitcoin remains king... but altcoins are gaining ground. The real secret of crypto success lies in understanding market dominance shifts and acting before the crowd does. If you master this chart, you master the market. Histogram Explanation Simple visual chart to support the content X-axis: Weeks or months (Example: April 1, April 8, April 15...) Y-axis: Percentage (%) showing dominance share. Bars: Blue bars represent Bitcoin's dominance (e.g., 52%, 50%, 48%). Green bars represent Altcoins' dominance (e.g., 48%, 50%, 52%). Easy to digest at one glance. Detailed Breakdown (Clear explanation for everyone): 🔵 When Bitcoin dominance rises: Investors are playing it safe. Confidence in Bitcoin grows during uncertainty. Altcoins typically slow down or bleed. 🟢 When Bitcoin dominance falls: Investors are hungry for higher returns. Money starts rotating into Altcoins (ETH, SOL, XRP, and others). This is when Altseason starts insane gains are made Simple powerful points): Bitcoin dominance UP = Altcoins on hold. Bitcoin dominance DOWN = Altcoins ready to fly. Track the BTC dominance chart closely it's your map to real opportunities Strong punchline to leave impact ⚡ Money follows dominance shifts Learn it, track it, and ride the next crypto wave to success "Bitcoin leads, but altcoins conquer. Choose your battles wisely!" "Dominance is not just a chart it’s a roadmap to wealth." "Smart money knows: when Bitcoin breathes, altcoins roar."

As the cryptocurrency world continues to mature, new projects emerge that promise to reshape industries, build new ecosystems, and create fresh wealth opportunities for early believers. One project that's beginning to spark serious interest is $INIT — the native token of the Initia ecosystem. But the big question for investors remains: Could $INIT be the next major winner, and what might its price look like over the next few years? Let’s dive deep into the fundamentals, upcoming catalysts, risks, and expert insights to build a thoughtful $INIT price forecast for 2025–2028. Understanding $INIT: What Sets It Apart? Before speculating on price, it's essential to understand what $INIT actually offers. Initia positions itself as a modular Layer-1/Layer-2 hybrid blockchain optimized for scalability, customization, and multichain interoperability. Unlike traditional Layer-1 blockchains that struggle with congestion or excessive fees, Initia combines: Sovereign rollups (customized chains for different apps and projects) A unified shared security model Native interoperability between rollups Built-in DeFi primitives and multichain support In simple terms, Initia aims to solve the "fragmentation" problem by allowing projects to easily create custom chains without sacrificing user experience or security. This next-generation architecture could make Initia a go-to platform for both developers and users in a world increasingly reliant on modular and scalable blockchain solutions. Key Factors Supporting $INIT’s Long-Term Growth Several factors suggest that $INIT could experience significant appreciation through 2025–2028: 1. Technological Edge Initia is tapping into two mega-trends simultaneously: Rollups and appchains: Customized rollups are seen as the future of scaling blockchain networks. Interoperability: A blockchain ecosystem where applications and users can interact freely without barriers will be far more valuable than siloed networks. By aligning itself with these trends, Initia is "building where the puck is going," not where it has been. 2. Early-Stage Advantage As of 2025, Initia is still in its infancy. Early projects that offer real technological innovation (like Solana in 2020 or Avalanche in early 2021) often experience exponential growth once adoption begins snowballing. While not guaranteed, $INIT's early-stage status offers higher upside potential compared to saturated legacy projects. 3. Strong Team and Backing Initia’s team is composed of experienced developers and blockchain veterans who understand the technical and business sides of building a sustainable Layer-1/Layer-2 ecosystem. Additionally, if venture capital backing remains strong, it can fuel development, marketing, and partnerships. 4. Built-In DeFi Infrastructure DeFi is still one of the main drivers of on-chain activity. Initia’s built-in primitives — such as automated market makers, native stablecoins, and liquidity staking — can kickstart early adoption by offering developers critical financial tools immediately. Potential Price Forecast for $INIT (2025–2028) Now, let's explore some possible price scenarios based on current project fundamentals, market conditions, and historical analogs: Base Case Scenario 2025: $INIT gains moderate adoption as developers begin building rollups and DeFi apps on the platform. Broader crypto market recovery helps $INIT gain momentum. Estimated price range: $1.20 – $2.50. 2026: Initia hosts dozens of active projects, transaction volume grows, and $INIT becomes increasingly used for staking, governance, and fees. Estimated price range: $2.80 – $5.00. 2027: As blockchain adoption accelerates globally, Initia becomes recognized as a leader in modular scalability. $INIT sees heavy demand from users, validators, and developers. Estimated price range: $6.00 – $10.00. 2028: If Initia continues expanding its ecosystem and securing partnerships, $INIT could be considered a "blue-chip" modular blockchain token. Estimated price range: $12.00 – $18.00. Bullish Scenario (Best Case) If Initia becomes the dominant platform for rollups — stealing significant market share from Ethereum rollups, Cosmos appchains, and Avalanche subnets — then $INIT could follow a growth curve similar to Solana’s historic rise: 2025: Strong developer adoption and liquidity inflow. $2.50 – $5.00. 2026: Breakout year as Initia hosts major DeFi protocols and NFT/gaming platforms. $8.00 – $15.00. 2027: $INIT begins to be seen as critical infrastructure for the decentralized internet. $20.00 – $35.00. 2028: At peak, $INIT could be valued in the range of major Layer-1s today. Potential price target: $40.00+. (Note: These figures are hypothetical and based on ideal adoption conditions.) Bearish Scenario (Worst Case) Not every project fulfills its promises. If Initia faces technical challenges, low adoption, or a severe crypto winter, $INIT may struggle: 2025–2026: Price stagnates or declines due to lack of user traction. $0.30 – $0.80. 2027–2028: Project struggles to differentiate itself in an oversaturated modular blockchain market. $0.10 – $0.50. Risks to Watch Out For No investment is without risks, and $INIT is no exception. Here are a few major concerns to keep on your radar: High Competition: Established platforms like Ethereum, Cosmos, and Avalanche are also advancing modularity and scalability. Regulatory Pressure: Increased regulatory scrutiny around rollups, DeFi, or token issuance could impact Initia's growth. Technical Execution: The success of Initia heavily depends on delivering its technical promises without delays or security flaws. Market Cycles: Broader economic downturns or crypto bear markets could suppress prices, even if fundamentals remain strong. y. $INIT

Im taking another long position here on $MYRO 📈  Blue support zone is strong, + you have a bullish main trend & uptrend supporting prices. Send it for a round 4? 🤑🚀